Benchmarking CO-AIMS with Peer OBE Systems: A Comparative Study of Academic Information Management Tools

Authors

  • Norhalida Othman Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Pasir Gudang Campus, 81750 Masai, Johor, Malaysia. Author
  • Ezril Hisham Mat Saat Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Pasir Gudang Campus, 81750 Masai, Johor, Malaysia. Author
  • Nur Amalina Muhamad Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Pasir Gudang Campus, 81750 Masai, Johor, Malaysia. Author
  • Noor Hasliza Abdul Rahman Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Pasir Gudang Campus, 81750 Masai, Johor, Malaysia. Author
  • Nor Diyana Md Sin Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Pasir Gudang Campus, 81750 Masai, Johor, Malaysia. Author
  • Mohd Syafiq Md Salleh Toyo Kanetsu Malaysia, PT 50001, Jalan Telaga Simpul, Teluk Kalong, 24000 Kemaman, Terengganu. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v11i2.598

Keywords:

CO-AIMS, OBE, CQI, CO-PO Mapping

Abstract

The growing adoption of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in higher education has intensified the need for academic information systems that would be able to monitor Program Outcomes (POs) effectively, enable Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI), and assist with transparent evidence for accreditation. While institutions have developed or availed digital tools in majority, their responsiveness and effectiveness are still largely disparate. This study contrasts the College of Engineering Academic Information Management System (CO-AIMS) developed at UiTM Pasir Gudang with similar peer OBE-support systems like eOutcomes at Taylor's University, the Universiti Teknologi Malaysia OBE system, SmartOBE, and the OBE-Support platform at Universitas Indonesia. Taking a comparative methodology with six evaluation criteria—functionality, data analytics, user experience, CO-PO mapping efficiency, CQI integration, and scalability—this study draws conclusions based on system documentation, literature data, and academic staff feedback. Its findings show that CO-AIMS presents strong points in usability, PO attainment tracking, and academic advisory support through reduced dashboards and easy reporting options that reduce lecturer workload. However, gaps also emerged in terms of interoperability with Learning Management Systems (LMS), scalability beyond one department, and the absence of AI-driven predictive analytics characteristic of newer systems. By systematic comparison of CO-AIMS with peer systems, this study contributes a benchmarking structure finding both strengths and limitations to generate actionable recommendations for system improvement and institutional planning. The results underscore the importance of continued progress to ensure OBE-friendly systems remain flexible to address evolving accreditation standards and the digital revolution in tertiary education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.

ALBayati, M. T. A. (2025). Benchmarking in higher education: A Comprehensive review. Khazayin of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.69938/keas.25020211.

Andal Gamboa, R., & Namasivayam, S. (2013). A blueprint of software enabled quantitative measurement of programme outcomes: A case study for Taylor’s University. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 8(SPL.ISSUE), 67–69.

Aragón, V. S., Coello Coello, C. A., & Leguizamón, M. G. (2020). A T-cell algorithm for solving dynamic economic power dispatch problems. Journal of Computer Science and Technology (Argentina), 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24215/16666038.20.e01.

Asbari, M., & Nurhayati, W. (2024). Outcomes-Based Education in Indonesian higher education: Empowering students’ learning competencies. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 5(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v5i5.445.

Dufault, C. L., Colson, E. R., Dallaghan, G. L. B., Buchanan, A. O., Aagaard, E. M., Blaylock, L., Wroblewski, M., Osterberg, L., Roman, B. J. B., & Coplit, L. (2025). Using dashboards to support continuous quality improvement in undergraduate and graduate medical education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 40(1), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09011-2.

Evardo, M. A. (2023). Outcomes - Based education implementation : Knowledge, skills and academic performance. European Chemical Bulletin, 12(7), 6244-6250.

Kivunja, C. (2014). Theoretical perspectives of how digital natives learn. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n1p94.

Liu, C., Wang, G. C., & Wang, H. F. (2025). The application of artificial intelligence in engineering education: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 13, 17895–17910. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3532595.

Mistamiruddin, E., & Mohamad Nasri, N. (2024). Challenges in integrating Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(4), 1135–1150. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i4/23378.

Mohd Noor, N., Boll Kassim, N. Q., Aani, S. N. A., Adam, S., Wan Ahmed, W. N., Othman, H., & Khairuddin, F. (2024). Factors influencing Outcome Based Education (OBE) engagement among lecturers in Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM). Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(SI21), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v9isi21.6080.

Namoun, A., Taleb, A., & Benaida, M. (2018). An expert comparison of accreditation support tools for the undergraduate computing programs. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(9), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2018.090948.

Othman, N., Mat Saat, E. H., Saat, M., Muhamad, N. A., Anuar, N. H. K., & Majid, M. A. (2024). The development an outcome-based education (OBE) system for measuring student programme attainment. Journal of Computing Research and Innovation, 9(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v9i2.472.

Popovic, C. (2013). Teaching for quality learning at university. (2nd ed.). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(4), 422-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.839332.

Safiudin, A., . S., Sulistyo, M. E., Pramono, S., & Ramelan, A. (2020). The development of web-based outcome based education information system. Journal of Electrical, Electronic, Information, and Communication Technology, 2(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.20961/jeeict.2.2.45291.

Sanusi, I. T., Olaleye, S. A., Agbo, F. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). The role of learners’ competencies in artificial intelligence education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100098.

Sengupta, S., & Das, A. K. (2023). Automated mapping of course outcomes to program outcomes using natural language processing and machine learning. In Proceedings of 2023 IEEE 3rd Applied Signal Processing Conference, ASPCON 2023 (pp. 44–48). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASPCON59071.2023.10396272.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

General Computing

How to Cite

Benchmarking CO-AIMS with Peer OBE Systems: A Comparative Study of Academic Information Management Tools. (2026). Journal of Computing Research and Innovation, 11(2), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v11i2.598