Selection of Agricultural Techniques for Farmers in Northern Kedah Using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Authors

  • Khairu Azlan Abd Aziz Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Perlis Branch, Arau Campus, 02600, Perlis. Author
  • Wan Suhana Wan Daud Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Intelligent Computing, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600, Arau, Perlis. Author
  • Mohd Fazril Izhar Mohd Idris Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Perlis Branch, Arau Campus, 02600, Perlis. Author
  • Rizauddin Saian Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Perlis Branch, Arau Campus, 02600, Perlis. Author
  • Ammar Zakwan Mohd Afandi Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Perlis Branch, Arau Campus, 02600, Perlis. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v11i2.604

Keywords:

Fuzzy AHP, Agricultural Techniques, Effective Farming, Consistency Ratio, Weight of Criteria

Abstract

Agriculture plays a vital role in sustaining human life by maintaining land, cultivating crops, and raising livestock for food, medicine, and other uses. It also contributes significantly to national economies and global food security. This study uses the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) method to identify the most efficient agricultural practices for northern part of Kedah farmers, determine the criteria for efficient farming, evaluate alternatives, and rank them according to their effectiveness. Three alternatives, which are conventional, organic, and technological practices, as well as five criteria, including satisfaction, knowledge, environment, practicality, and economic, were evaluated. According to the findings, knowledge is the most important factor (weight: 0.5436), whereas satisfaction (0.0523) was considered less important. With a global weight of 44.32%, the technological approach was the most successful agricultural method among the alternatives. Organic methods were the least preferred (25.69%), while conventional methods came in second (29.99%). These results highlight how crucial knowledge and technology are to obtaining effective and sustainable farming methods. In addition to giving policymakers and organisations useful information for guiding investments and operations, this study offers farmers a structured framework for evaluating and carrying out appropriate farming practices. It draws attention to the necessity of region-specific solutions and provides a starting point for more study to improve methods of sustainable agriculture in other areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd Aziz, K. A., Wan Daud, W. S., Mohd Fazril Izhar Mohd Idris, Kamal Azman, N. A., & Saian, R. (2025). Evaluating students’ bread preferences in UiTM Perlis: An application of the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Computing Research and Innovation, 10(2), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v10i2.519.

Azarbad, H. (2022). Conventional vs. organic agriculture–which one promotes better yields and microbial resilience in rapidly changing climates? Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 903500. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.903500.

Bhatt, N., Guru, S., Thanki, S., & Sood, G. (2021). Analysing the factors affecting the selection of ERP package: a fuzzy AHP approach. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 19(2), 641–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-021-00521-8.

Deng, F., Pu, J., Huang, Y., & Han, Q. (2023). 3D geological suitability evaluation for underground space based on the AHP-cloud model. Underground Space, 8, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2022.03.006.

Duvaleix, S., Lassalas, M., Latruffe, L., Konstantidelli, V., & Tzouramani, I. (2020). Adopting environmentally friendly farming practices and the role of quality labels and producer organisations: A qualitative analysis based on two european case studies. Sustainability, 12(24), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410457.

Emran, S. Al, Krupnik, T. J., Aravindakshan, S., Kumar, V., & Pittelkow, C. M. (2021). Factors contributing to farm-level productivity and household income generation in coastal Bangladesh s rice-based farming systems. PLoS ONE, 16(9), e0256694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256694.

Kumar, A., & Pant, S. (2023). Analytical hierarchy process for sustainable agriculture: An overview. MethodsX, 10(101954). https://doi.org/ij.mex.2022.101954.

Lin, C. N. (2020). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based analysis of the dynamic sustainable management index in leisure agriculture. Sustainability, 12(13), 5395. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135395.

Liu, M., Chen, X., & Jiao, Y. (2024). Sustainable agriculture: Theories, methods, practices and policies. Agriculture, 14(3), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030473.

Palm oil industry in Malaysia - Statistics & facts. (2024). Statista Research Department. https://www.statista.com/topics/5814/palm-oil-industry-in-malaysia/#editorsPicks.

Rouyendegh, B. D., & Savalan, Ş. (2022). An integrated fuzzy MCDM hybrid methodology to analyze agricultural production. Sustainability, 14(8), 4835. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084835.

Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.

Saiful, W., Jan, W., Abdullah, T., Badawi, A., Wan, W. S., & Foreword, J. (2011). Modern Agrotechnology and Subsidies in Malaysian Agriculture: Are We Using Them Wisely? Foreword by Modern agrotechnology and subsidies in Malaysian agriculture: Are we using them wisely? www.ideas.org.myiwww.ideas.org.my.

Sharma, V., Tripathi, A. K., & Mittal, H. (2022). Technological revolutions in smart farming: Current trends, challenges & future directions. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 201, 107217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107217.

Sumberg, J., & Giller, K. E. (2022). What is ‘conventional’ agriculture? Global Food Security, 32, 100617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100617.

Tripathi, H. G., Smith, H. E., Sallu, S. M., Machera, S. D., Florence, M., Maburuki, M., Maurice, S., Kunin, W. E., & Sait, S. M. (2024). Farmers’ biodiversity knowledge improves natural enemy conservation in agricultural ecosystems. Crop Protection, 183, 106777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106777.

Tumwebaze, R. P., Walsh, J. N., & Lannon, J. (2025). Knowledge management in the agriculture sector: a systematic literature review. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 23(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2024.2359419.

Zhang, X., & Yang, Z. (2022). Individual and village level factors affect farmers’ satisfaction with sustainable rural development practices: Evidence from Guangdong Province in China. Agriculture, 12(10), 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101702.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

General Computing

How to Cite

Selection of Agricultural Techniques for Farmers in Northern Kedah Using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. (2026). Journal of Computing Research and Innovation, 11(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v11i2.604